Connect with us

Hi, what are you looking for?

Dallas Morning News

Texas Supreme Court says governor cannot order trans child abuse investigations

The court sided with the state in striking down a statewide injunction on investigations into the families of trans youth, but said Gov. Abbott had no authority to order them in the first place.

Protesters
Protesters carry signs during the “Trans Kids Cry For Help” rally outside Texas Governor Greg Abbott’s Mansion in Austin, Texas, Sunday, March 13, 2022. On May 13, 2022, the Texas Supreme Court issued an opinion in a case involving investigations into the families of transgender youth. (Elias Valverde II/The Dallas Morning News/TNS)(Elias Valverde II / TNS)

By Lauren McGaughy

AUSTIN — The Texas Supreme Court on Friday struck down a statewide injunction halting child abuse investigations into the parents of transgender youth, while keeping in place a block on the case of one family who sued the state.

In a split ruling on Friday, the court agreed with the state that a lower court could not block all such abuse investigations statewide. But it also noted the governor and attorney general had no authority to order the Texas Department of Family and Protective Services undertake these investigations in the first place.

“Neither the Governor nor the Attorney General has statutory authority to directly control DFPS’s investigatory decisions. They have every right to express their views on DFPS’s decisions and to seek, within the law, to influence those decisions — but DFPS alone bears legal responsibility for its decisions,” the opinion read.

The ruling means that DFPS need not continue investigating the parents of transgender children if the agency does not believe there is any abuse. It was also a strong rebuke to Attorney General Ken Paxton and Gov. Greg Abbott reminding them that there are limits on the state’s power — especially when it comes to parents’ rights.

“DFPS’s preliminary authority to investigate allegations does not entail the ultimate authority to interfere with parents’ decisions about their children, decisions which enjoy some measure of constitutional protection whether the government agrees with them or not,” the opinion read.

A spokesman with the Department of Family and Protective Services said the agency is reviewing the ruling.

Brian Klosterboer, an attorney with the ACLU of Texas who is representing the family who sued, said the court said it is now up to DFPS whether to restart those investigations it had already opened. He urged them not to while litigation continues.

“While the lawsuit continues, DFPS should not take any action against any families or any transgender young people in Texas,” Klosterboer told The Dallas Morning News. “It would be unconscionable.”

Abbot and Paxton, whose agency is litigating the case on behalf of the state, did not immediately respond to a request for comment. But in a tweet from his campaign account, Paxton described the lifting of the injunction as a win and said he would continue to target gender affirming care for trans kids.

“I’ll do all I can to stop it,” he said.

Individualized, age appropriate care for trans youth — including the treatments Paxton calls abuse — is supported by all of the state and nation’s largest physician groups, including the Texas and American Medical Associations.

On Feb. 22, Paxton issued a nonbinding opinion that classified certain gender-affirming treatments such as puberty blockers and hormone therapy as child abuse. Gov. Greg Abbott, citing this opinion, then directed the Department of Family and Protective Services to investigate all reports of minors receiving such care.

DFPS is in the executive branch under Abbott and the governor appoints the agency’s commissioner.

Since then, the state has opened at least nine investigations, including into the parents of a transgender teenager whose mother works for the child protective service agency. The mother, known anonymously as Jane Doe, sued the state over the policy change. Megan Mooney is also a plaintiff in the case. A psychologist based in Houston, Mooney worries she will be violating her medical ethics and that her job might be at stake if she abides by the state’s abuse directive.

In March, the Third Court of Appeals granted Doe’s request for an injunction to put all investigations started under Abbott’s order on hold. Paxton appealed it to the Supreme Court. After the Friday ruling, the merits of Doe and Mooney’s case will continue to be litigated in court.

Paul Castillo, an attorney with Lambda Legal who is representing the plaintiffs alongside the ACLU, said child protective services still has the authority to investigate families of transgender children if they believe there is abuse.

But any families who feel they are targeted solely because they are seeking medical treatments for their trans children should contact the ACLU and Lambda Legal, he said.

Gender affirming medical care for transgender youth has become a political flashpoint in Texas in recent years. During the 2021 legislative session, lawmakers tried and failed to ban treatments such as puberty blockers and hormone therapy to treat gender dysphoria in minors.

Paxton and Abbott’s letters were issued in the midst of the most competitive Republican primary season in a decade. Abbott, whose challenger was pressuring him to take a stand against gender affirming care, won his primary outright and will face Democrat Beto O’Rourke in the November general election.

Paxton was pushed into a May 24 runoff with GOP challenger George P. Bush.

Written By

Click to comment

You must be logged in to post a comment Login

Leave a Reply

ADVERTISEMENT

IMM MASK Promos

ADVERTISEMENT

You May Also Like

Dallas Morning News

Botham Jean’s family, the Dallas County district attorney’s office, and more than 6,300 people who signed an online petition protested her parole.

Dallas Morning News

Cecilia Castellano’s House race against Don McLaughlin Jr. attracts national, international attention.v

Dallas Morning News

The report was tweaked to remove any mention of who’s at fault for violating contractual requirements

Dallas Morning News

Experts say Cobb-Bey’s social media, court filings hint at a belief system rooted in fringe elements of Moorish Science and “sovereign citizenship.”

Advertisement